（24-25高三下·重庆·阶段练习）Stories written by the latest version of ChatGPT were nearly as good as those written by human authors, according to new research on the narrative skills of artificial intelligence. But when people were told a story was written by AI — whether the true author was an AI or a person — they rated the story poorly, a sign that people distrust and dislike AI-generated art.
“AI is good at writing something that is consistent, logical and coherent. But it is still weaker at writing engaging stories than people are,” said Haoran “Chris” Chu, Ph.D．, co-author of the new study. Chu and his co-author, Sixiao Liu, Ph.D．, published their findings in the Journal of Communication.
The researchers exposed people to two different versions of the same stories. One was written by a person and the other by ChatGPT. Survey participants then rated how engaged they were with the stories. To test how people’s beliefs about AI influenced their ratings, Chu and Liu changed how the stories were labeled. Sometimes the AI story was correctly labeled as written by a computer. Other times people were told it was written by a human. The human-authored stories also had their labels bartered.
The surveys focused on two key elements of narratives: counterarguing — the experience of picking a story apart — and transportation. “Transportation is a very familiar experience,” Chu said. “It’s the feeling of being so engaged in the narrative you don’t feel the sticky seats in the movie theater anymore. Because people are so engaged, they often lower their defenses to the persuasive content in the narrative and reduce their counterarguing.”
While people generally rated AI stories as equally persuasive as those written by humans, the computer-written stories were less effective at transporting people into the world of the narrative.
“AI does not write like a master writer. That’s probably good news for people like Hollywood screenwriters — for now,” Chu said.
159．What does the author highlight about AI-generated stories in paragraph 1?
A．They are lacking in coherence. B．They are discriminated against.
C．They show great narrative skills. D．They rely partly on human work.
160．What does the word “bartered” underlined in paragraph 3 mean?
A．Rated. B．Attached.
C．Removed. D．Exchanged.
161．What can we infer about counterarguing and transportation?
A．They work in conflict with one another.
B．They are both need improving for authors.
C．They increase the persuasive power of a movie.
D．They apply to understanding different narratives.
162．What is Chu’s view on AI writing for Hollywood movies?
A．It is unrealistic at present.
B．It will be a win-win story.
C．It is a well-established fact.
D．It will prove fruitless anyway.
【答案】159．B 160．D 161．A 162．A
【知识点】科普知识 、说明文、人工智能
该题有详细解析可以查阅1、本网站所提供的信息，只供教育教学参考之用。
2、本网站及其会员一概毋须以任何方式就任何信息传递或传送的失误、不准确或错误对用户或任何其他人士负任何直接或间接的责任。
3、在法律允许的范围内，本网站在此声明,不承担用户或任何人士就使用或未能使用本网站所提供的信息或任何链接或项目所引致的任何直接、间接、附带、从属、特殊、惩罚性或惩戒性的损害赔偿。
4、访问者在从事与本网站相关的所有行为(包括但不限于访问浏览、利用、转载、宣传介绍)时，必须以善意且谨慎的态度行事；访问者不得故意或者过失的损害本网站的各类合法权益，不得利用本网站以任何方式直接或者间接的从事违反中华人民共和国法律、国际公约以及社会公德的行为。对于访问者利用本网站提供的信息而作出的任何决策、决定以及其后果，本网站不承担任何责任
5、本网站图片，文字之类版权，本网站无法鉴别所上传图片或文字的知识版权，如果侵犯，请及时通知我们，本网站将在第一时间及时删除。
6、凡以任何方式登录本网站或直接、间接使用本网站资料者，视为自愿接受本网站声明的约束。
XueXi Design
